Contact Us Today 718-793-1900


Rescheduling Traffic Court? Here’s What You Need to Know.

Posted by Terri B. Kalker | May 23, 2022 | 0 Comments

When it comes to the rights of a motorist to reschedule a ticket, Judges have become increasingly stringent.  Gone are the days when one can expect an ALJ (to routinely reschedule a ticket.  Even getting a first reschedule requires a “valid reason” to be professed.  Such acceptable excuses are:  to hire an attorney or to gather evidence.  However, when the case is on for the second time, the reason for a reschedule must be more extraordinary.

Contrast this now with how the Traffic Violations Bureau can reschedule cases.  It used to be that the court can administratively reschedule a case up to 2 times.  This would be traditionally done at least 10 days in advance.  Now, I have seen 3 or 4 administrative reschedules and 7 days in advance.  Moreover, they have added an additional type of reschedule called an “office” reschedule.  This can be if the police officer is too busy or will be on vacation.  It is not usual for a case to have 3 administrative reschedules plus 3 office reschedules.

A “police non-appearance” of the day of the trial can generate a dismissal for the motorist.  However, even here, judges have been given strict parameters of when they can dismiss.  In many cases, they have been ruling that a motorist must appear again and only if the police officer misses again will the case be dismissed.  Some common reasons for this can be that the alleged reason the police did not appear – such as an injury, an emergency, or testifying in another court.  However, no one checks the veracity of the alleged reasons.  A motorist's driving record also comes into play when an ALJ is deciding whether to dismiss a case.  The actual standard is if the judge feels a dismissal can result in a substantial safety hazard, a new date can be given against the police officer even if there was no reason for the non appearance.  Here too, the TVB has created “required appearances” out of specific sections of law (failure to yield to pedestrians) or the status of a motorist's license when he received the ticket (probation, suspended, etc.).

What we see here is:  What is good for the goose is NOT good for the gander.  The judges claim they need to expedite cases when a motorist is seeking a reschedule.  When it comes to their own reschedules or that of the police officer, it seems there is no end to reschedules.

Shame on the legal department of The Department of Motor Vehicles for allowing for this mocking of justice.

If you need help fighting tickets like these, reach out to us and we can help.

Contact us today.

[email protected]

(718) 793-1900

About the Author

Terri B. Kalker

I have been successfully defending motorists accused of all types of moving violations. Regardless of the charge, we realize it is important to you and we treat it so. My staff are all professional and at your service as soon as you call. We maintain extended business hours for your convenience. ...


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Ticket Defenders Today

Ticket Defenders is committed to answering your questions about traffic ticket law issues throughout New York state. We'll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.